Skip to content
HalversonReed

Practice · 02

Operations & Performance

Margin is built and lost in the operating model. We work shoulder-to-shoulder with operators on the changes that compound — process, network, cost, and cadence.

Operations is the part of consulting where the pretensions burn off fastest. Either the program reduces costs, accelerates throughput, and improves service — or it does not, and the operators who watched the work get done know exactly which it was. Halverson Reed's operations and performance practice is built around that test.

Our work runs across four areas. Network and footprint — the physical and logistical configuration of the business, often the largest source of structural cost and the hardest to revisit without an outside view. Cost programs — the disciplined identification and execution of cost reductions that survive the first review cycle, do not require new headcount to administer, and do not damage the parts of the business that drive customer retention. Process and throughput — the unglamorous, compounding work of cycle-time reduction, yield improvement, and the operating cadence required to make changes hold. And operational diligence — the pre-transaction work that determines whether an acquirer will inherit a problem that absorbs the first two years of ownership.

We are typically retained by ownership groups, sponsors, or executive teams who have either an operating problem they cannot fully see from the inside, or a transaction whose value depends on operational changes they are not yet equipped to execute. Engagements range from a four-week diagnostic — sometimes during a sale process, sometimes after a disappointing quarter — to multi-year operational transformations conducted alongside the executive team.

What distinguishes our operations work is the seniority and the operating background of the team. The partner on the engagement is a partner of the firm, and our operations partner spent years in operating roles before returning to consulting. He brings to every engagement an instinct for what change a workforce will absorb, what will quietly fail in the second month of implementation, and what kind of cadence is required to make the work hold past the consulting team's departure.

Our operations practice is closest to the work the firm has done since 1978. The methods have evolved; the discipline — that the operating answer is the only answer that matters — has not.

How we engage

Three phases. One team. The partner is in the room throughout.

Phase 1

Diagnose

Hands-on assessment of the operating model — sites, processes, network, cost structure, and the management cadence that holds them together.

Phase 2

Design

We work with operators to design the changes — sequenced for impact, designed to be sustained, and tested against what the workforce can absorb.

Phase 3

Deliver

We stay through implementation. The work is judged on what changes in the business, not on the deliverables that announce the change.

Representative outcomes

What our work has produced — anonymized, drawn from the practice.

18%

Reduction in COGS

Mid-market specialty chemicals manufacturer; fourteen-month engagement, sustained through the second annual cycle.

32%

Lead-time reduction

Multi-site industrial distributor; combined network reconfiguration and process redesign at the regional hubs.

4 of 11

Sites consolidated

North American footprint optimization for a privately held branded consumer manufacturer.

Practice lead

If a change cannot survive the second month of implementation, it was never a change. Most of what we do is design for what the workforce will actually sustain.
James Whitfield · Partner, Operations & Performance
Read James Whitfield’s biography →

Have a challenge worth solving?

We work with leadership teams confronting decisions that will define the next several years of the business. If that sounds familiar, we should talk.

Schedule a Conversation